Beethoven Interpretations Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Beethoven Interpretations - Research Paper ExampleBeethoven was showing signs of amorousism in his middle period. Beethoven left the sonata form but the independence he gave each movement is typically Romantic. The Piano Sonata N 27 is a beautiful piece of practice of medicine which has been interpreted in legion(predicate) varied ways. The Sonata has troika movements adagio sostenuto, allegretto and presto. It can take anywhere from 12 minutes to 15 minutes to perform depending on the interpretation. Beethoven composed it in 1801. He personally put the title as Quasia una fantasia or almost a fantasy. This means that it can be played as the artist sees fit. In listening to the difference of performance, it can be said that Beethovens title is more accurate than Moonlight Sonata. A fantasy gives more freedom to perform the music as the performer wants. The name Moonlight Sonata was given as a publishing trick. Some say it was given after Beethovens death. Others say Beethoven g ave it as a tribute to his student, Guicciardi. Beethoven had fallen in love with her, a countess. He knew he could never marry someone of that social class. It is unlike him to claim been so open as to name a sonata after someone who was paying the bills. This sonata was composed in his middle period. He was not composing romantic music. The title was misplaced (5). His music was steadily leaving the classical form (Waltz). In this Sonata, you see a difference between each performer, which is contrasting. Beethoven would take up been heavy in his interpretation. He was already affected by his deafness. The loud pounding of the keys in the last movement enabled Beethoven to hear the vibrations. I listened to many different interpretations in modulate to get the right feeling for the Sonata. In my research, I saw that the Moonlight Sonata was one of his most famous sonatas. I was strike at seeing that it could be played so differently by such artist. I chose two artists to explai n the three movements (the whole Sonata) in order to project a comprehensive feeling of the dynamics and tempo Bareboim and Gould. Their interpretation is so different. Then I chose two other artists in order to par their first movement Horowitz and Brendel in addition to Bareboim and Gould. I think my favorite of them all was Gould because I felt he was the closest to how Beethoven would have wish the Sonata to be played. In terms of the first movement, I felt it was a classic to hear Horowitz. http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpOb5NxtG-w Baremboim played the first movement with perception and slowly. He was sad or pensive. His expression was sad. The dynamics were softly played piano. There was, too, much of a difference with the two hands. The bass continued to have the same level of sound during the whole movement and the treble would have crescendos and be too loud. He used a little bit of the rubatto effect. The time of the first movement was 6.55. Only towards the end did th e two hands converse with each other. The end was slow. There was too much conflict between the three note motif and the left hand. His left hand dominated the right only one time during the movement. Towards the end of the movement, he increased in tawdriness and there was a slight crescendo of the left hand which tapered off in the final measure. His bass and treble were blended and not articulate. The fast of the 2nd movement was still slow. It was happy.